日本強日本弱/ 「海の健全度指数」、日本は１１位

「海の健全度指数」、日本は１１位　国際環境ＮＧＯ発表

関連トピックス

• 生物多様性条約

　漁獲や水の汚れ、生物多様性などから総合評価した「海の健全度指数」を計算すると日本は１１位――。こんな結果を、国際環境ＮＧＯコンサベーション・インターナショナルなどがまとめ、１６日付英科学誌ネイチャー電子版で発表した。
　世界人口の４割以上が沿岸部に住み、人口増で海への依存が高まるとの見通しを念頭に、１７１の国・地域の海について「持続可能な漁業」や「海岸の保 全」、「水の清浄度」など１０の目標を１００点満点で採点。世界の海の状態を総合評価し、政策決定に役立ててもらう初の試みで、点数が高いほど海洋資源を 持続可能な形で活用していることになるという。世界全体の総合点は６０点だった。
　最も点数が高かったのは、南太平洋の無人島、米国領ジャービス島（８６点）だったが、上位にはドイツ（４位・７３点）やカナダ（９位・７０点）など政治・経済が安定した先進国が並んだ。一方、西アフリカの国々は点数が低かった。

Ocean Health Index Estimates World’s Oceans Score 60 out of 100

Posted by Dr. Sebastian Troeng | 08.15.2012 | No Comments | ShareThis

Sunset in Raja Ampat, Indonesia. This area of the Pacific is often called the “global epicenter of marine biodiversity.” It’s also the life support system of the people of West Papua, providing a significant source of protein, jobs in marine tourism, and coastal protection from storms and tsunamis. (© CI/photo by Sterling Zumbrunn)

The London Olympics captivated the world over the last few weeks, as we watched our home countries’ competitors achieve new heights in athletic prowess. As a society, we celebrate their performances and encourage them to get even better in the future. My question is: What if this sort of ambition carried over into other aspects of society?
Consider the oceans — the world’s largest resource. The oceans provide us with ample seafood, coastal protection, cultural identity, livelihoods and a host of other benefits, yet so far we have not prioritized their protection. With 7 billion people on the planet, almost half of whom live close to the coast, securing sustainable benefits from the ocean is not only a moral imperative, it’s a matter of long-term survival for people and societies.
In the past, the lack of a comprehensive and clear measurement of ocean health has been a major factor preventing progress. In order to fill this gap, this week we are launching the Ocean Health Index, a collaboration between 65 of the world’s leading ocean experts, including scientists from CI, the National Center of Ecological Analysis and Synthesis at University of California, University of British Columbia, the National Geographic Society and the New England Aquarium.
The Ocean Health Index is the first-ever comprehensive global measurement of marine health that includes people as a critical part of the ocean ecosystem. It scientifically scores the sustainability of 10 “goals,” or benefits people expect from the oceans, to generate an objective snapshot of the overall health of the oceans, as well as the marine areas controlled by each coastal country.
So what is the global score for the state of the world’s oceans? A meager 60 (out of a top score of 100). This low score highlights how far we are from where we need to be to ensure the oceans can continue to provide the benefits we depend upon in the future.
CI’s marine programs improve ocean health in several ways. Over the coming months, my colleagues and I will share with you inspiring stories of success and highlight how the work of CI and our partners in government, business and civil society organizations advance ocean health through initiatives like:

• Seascapes: We expand a variety of marine protected areas that allow species and habitats to recover while offering people opportunities to benefit from sustainable fisheries, tourism, clean water and other products of healthy ecosystems.
• Regional agreements: We scale up our seascapes work in larger protected area networks, including the Coral Triangle Initiative and Pacific Oceanscape.
• Blue carbon conservation and climate change adaptation: We conserve mangroves, seagrass beds and salt marshes that provide carbon storage and coastal protection for people, property and infrastructure.
• Sustainable fisheries: We aim to improve global fish stocks through better managed coastal fisheries, sustainable aquaculture and participation in the Global Partnership for Oceans.

The Ocean Health Index offers the world’s governments, businesses and communities the opportunity to measure our progress; to adapt our strategies and approaches; to improve our performance. It also allows CI and our many partners to be faster, stronger and achieve more, just like the Olympic athletes we so admire. Hopefully the Ocean Health Index will also stimulate sound competition among countries to become champions for ocean health and continuously strive to improve their scores.

Sebastian Troeng

Advancing ocean health is a team sport. In order to restore healthy ocean ecosystems and safeguard benefits for people whom depend on them for their well-being and survival, we all need to play our part.



就 「就職活動」苦

 日本當前的疲弱根植於其傳統優勢──專守“monozukuri”（即製造的藝術）﹐專注於硬件的改進。這一理念是日本民族自豪感的來源﹐它推動該國的電 子公司竭力生產常常是世界上最薄最小的產品或是推出其他漸進的技術進步﹐但是它們忽視了人們真正關心的因素﹐例如產品的設計和使用的便利度。

以電子閱讀器業務為例﹐索尼專注於銷售設備﹐而亞馬遜則專注於銷售電子書。結果是﹐Kindle更加符合人們購買電子閱讀器的根本理由──買書、看書。剩下的事情大家都知道了。

 

今年6月份﹐津賀一宏(Kazuhiro Tsuga)在接任松下總裁的新聞發佈會上說道：“日本企業對自

己的技術和製造技能太自信了﹐

我們忽略了要從消費者的角度看待產品。”在此之前﹐
松下出現了公司94年曆史上最嚴重的年度虧損。

日本因何喪失電子業霸主地位？

Daisuke Wakabayashi

*****

告別「日本第一」傳奇 大國墜落 

高素質人民 縱容出最無能政客與政府

        遠見雜誌2012年3月號 第309期

作者：梁旅珠

http://www.gvm.com.tw/

Boardcontent_19671.html

---- 謝謝吳國精傳來此篇

我們無法用用一篇文章來談某一「大國」的全貌，

更無法作出有意義的「比較」，譬如說，美國或中國比日本強。

我讀後感是，《遠見雜誌》下標題很不專業，冒出「最無能」
的字眼。作者的思路也不夠嚴謹，所以看看即可。

一個國家總會出現一些異常的人，譬如說「日本通或中國通」，

甚或某業界(如電子代工或成衣界) 出個所謂的「成吉思汗」等，我們無法要求其國人多向其看齊。

一個國家的產業很多樣，彼此相互補充，
所以可能電子業的某些市場區隔的競爭力弱，汽車業卻可能表現不俗。這只是一例而已。